Religious principles are constructed from the images of philosophy. Philosophy is thought.Thought is Ethereal or of ether. Ether is Spirit/Soul, a particle of God or in the image of God's Self differentiated into each human body which is made from the combination of the four other gross elements in peculiar proportions. The design and architecture of human body is the greatest marvel of differentiation that God could achieve. Philosophy has a limit, which is the limitation prescribed by mind, when mind is dropped, philosophy is extended, extended philosophy is mysticism or spiritualism. Spiritual experiences at variance from material experiences is the foundation to further experiences of the Soul and not the mind as mind has already been dropped and Soul prevails in those experiences. Religion is only a path, religious principles are the dual aspects of rights and wrongs which are seen and felt in the journey jotted down by the saintly souls who trammeled those ways and wrote them down or told them to the posterity to follow so that they do not lose the path. Admiring the prophet or saint or praying and considering the prophet as God and devouting the time and thought and mind to those Gods are foolishness, knowing what they said as a sentient being and developing the mind and thought to those levels of mystical and spiritual experiences are what is intended by prophets and religions. Science is a small fraction of the creations imitated by the human mind copying the Gods techniques. i.e. from the brain a computer, from the eyes a camera, from the vocal chords a microphone, the ears a telephone or receiver, from the winking of the eyes an automatic door or the electric tram and the like................. Yes I agree to the extent that the idea of Darwin's theories might have come from the Dashavatara (The ten incarnations of Vishnu)
Well, your assumptions are false. Religion is not based on philosophy, at least any modern generally accepted philosophy. The "philosophy" you are calling all of philosophy is called dualism and is not accepted by any modern reputable philosopher. Only dualists believe in souls or God and there are none that are really doing philosophy. You find dualists mainly in religious schools that begin their world view with an unchallenged dualism, and thus are deeply in bed with circular reasoning, which is fraudulent.
You write, "Science is a small fraction of the creations imitated by the human mind copying the Gods techniques". This is a good example of circular reasoning. God exists because science is a small fraction of God's techniques. Science is copying what God did because there is a God.
This sort of reasoning is utter nonsense. Here is how to be honest. First of all you must prove or verify that God exists. If you cannot do that you cannot honestly say anything that is meaningful about what God did or does or says or creates or feels or whatever. But you jump over the requirement that you demonstrate God's existence right into believing all sorts of silly things about what God did or does. That means that you are not being honest to yourself or to others on these matters.
Darwins' Theory of Evolution (a single theory) did not come from Dashavatara or any of the other incarnations of Vishnu. If it did, then you have to be honest and supply the proof that it did. It came from the observation of species and establishing a simple principle to explain how different species might occur. Nothing religious or magic about science at all.
Science is based on the foundation of coming up with a testable hypothesis and then testing it to establish its validity. Religious beliefs can never be translated into testable hypotheses, so they can never be proven or verified. Consequently science and religion are very different and do not share a common foundation.
You write, "Science is a small fraction of the creations imitated by the human mind copying the Gods techniques". This is a good example of circular reasoning. God exists because science is a small fraction of God's techniques. Science is copying what God did because there is a God.
This sort of reasoning is utter nonsense. Here is how to be honest. First of all you must prove or verify that God exists. If you cannot do that you cannot honestly say anything that is meaningful about what God did or does or says or creates or feels or whatever. But you jump over the requirement that you demonstrate God's existence right into believing all sorts of silly things about what God did or does. That means that you are not being honest to yourself or to others on these matters.
Darwins' Theory of Evolution (a single theory) did not come from Dashavatara or any of the other incarnations of Vishnu. If it did, then you have to be honest and supply the proof that it did. It came from the observation of species and establishing a simple principle to explain how different species might occur. Nothing religious or magic about science at all.
Science is based on the foundation of coming up with a testable hypothesis and then testing it to establish its validity. Religious beliefs can never be translated into testable hypotheses, so they can never be proven or verified. Consequently science and religion are very different and do not share a common foundation.
--
Yours True Liars,
SoundaryaNayaki സൌണ്ടാര്യനായകി சௌந்தர்யநாயகி
Sivashanmugam സിവശന്മുഗം சிவஷண்முகம்
.
THE KNOWLEDGE WHICH NO ONE CAN HAVE...
No one can have the knowledge to make a thing which cannot exhibit: 1. divisibility 2. comparability 3. connectivity 4. disturbability 5. reorderability 6. substituability and 7. satisfiability.
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit divisibility be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit comparability be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit connectivity be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit disturbability be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit reorderability be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit substituability be made?
# Can a thing which cannot exhibit satisfiability be made?
Divisibility is the property without which no one can either be a part or be a whole. Comparability is the property without which no one can either be an equivalence or be a difference. Connectivity is the property without which no one can either be a link or be a limit. Disturbability is the property without which no one can either be a influence or be a sensation. Reorderability is the property without which no one can either be an origin or be a derivative. Substitutability is the property without which no one can either be a constituent or be a substituent. Satisfiability is the property without which no one can either be a requirement or a fulfillment.
THE VIRGIN EXPERIENCE REVEALS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snQL1UNvlfY
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Set all books on fire because no knowledge in them can be repeated and no knowledge in them should be repeated. Do not listen to your teachers or pastors, or mom and dad because none of their knowledge can be repeated and none of their knowledge should be repeated. But, do not forget to buy our books because we need your money. Do not forget to send your children to our schools and colleges, because we need your money. Listen to us, because we want you and your children to be our employees, slaves.